RUSTAM ALI versus STATE
Section 28 and 7 of the Conventional Code (XLV of 1860), Section 302 / 337H (ii) / 504 Transfer of Case Applicant / Complainant Moves from the Anti-Terrorist Court to another Anti-Terrorist Court at the point of trial Had requested to do. , Where the applicant and his witnesses are in a position to appear and be acquitted in the case against the accused. Because the accused party failed to appear before the applicant for fear of death and his witnesses could not appear in the Anti-Terrorism Court. The petitioner had requested that the two accused in custody and the other two accused have been subjected to severe action under section 28. The Anti-Terrorism Act 1997 was empowered to move the case from one counter-terrorism court to another, where it was fair or in the interest of justice or where the convenience of witnesses or the protection of the accused was needed. available. The case will be in the interest of justice and justice, and also to facilitate and protect the prosecution's witnesses that the case was transferred to the Anti-Terrorism Court.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
female advocates from Abdul Hakim lawyer