Find a Lawyer

GHULAM NABI versus STATE

Definition of Section 302 Evidence The entire case benefited from the doubt was based on the evidence of three witnesses, none of them involved the accused, no allegation was made, there was no benefit to the accused. This can be taken advantage of by stopping the property. For 21 months, the investigating officer had ruined the entire prosecution case, not even the recovering persons involved, and the accused persons were arrested and recovered from a densely populated area, but no private from the area. The person was not affiliated with and was not specified by the investigating officer. Why he did not relate to the private witnesses during his arrests and retrievals, but his evidence was not trustworthy and it was not safe to rely on him to maintain the conviction and conviction of the accused. The evidence and the testimonies submitted were examined by. The court was not trustworthy and the entire PPP was discriminatory in the matter of insufficient evidence, which, apart from being preferable, was not a matter of trust. The affected accused were acquitted and filled with doubt. Was released when you need a advocate from Hub Inds Estate lawyer