NAZIR AHMED NASIR versus STATE LIFE CORPORATION OF PAKISTAN
After retaining Article 49 Service Tribunals Act (LXX of 1973), removal of section 2A & 4 service (special powers) ordinance (XVII of 2000), section 10 constitution of Pakistan (1973), arts 199 and 212 constitutional application After retaining Section 2A of the Service Tribunals Act, 1973. Applicants of the service tribunal thought that before they would submit their treatment to the High Court regarding any complaints of the service. The Supreme Court, in treating the State Life Employees (Service) Regulations, 1973, held that the High Court, which, he believed, was legal in nature, was enacted under the provisions of Article 49 of the Life Insurance Act. Were. Order, 1972 State Life Employees (Service) Regulations, 1973 considered and treated by the High Court as inherently illegal, any attempt to overturn the decision of the service tribunal, the provisions of Article 1212 Cannot protect against The constitution is not before the High Court but before the Supreme Court, for instance, against such decision / order of the Service Tribunal, for example it was a case where proceedings under the Service (Special Powers) Ordinance, 2000. Was brought, the Seed Ordinance was a special law that provided special treatment and forums under the Section 10 (Special Powers) Ordinance 2000 of Special Removal from the Service, before the Appeal Service Tribunal. Against any order passed against the affected person, the Supreme Court is faced with the implications of the decision of PLD 2006 SC 602, in which case, it did not waive, the jurisdiction of the High Court under Article 199 of the Constitution Don't request
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2009
