Find a Lawyer

ABDUL JABBAR versus ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE

Schedule suits for the retrieval of Article 5 and dowry articles over time will either eliminate articles or lose their usefulness, but it depends on the nature of the articles to be restored to such an extent. It is not possible that articles such as furniture and utensils were of such a nature that they could not be subjected to casualties or complete wear during the marriage between the parties during this period.

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2009

• SHAMRAIZ AKHTAR alias SHAMMA v. State 2009 PCrLJ 361
• PETROSIN v. FAYSAL BANK 2009 CLD 361
• GHULAM MURTAZA v. State 2009 PLD 362
• NAZIR AHMED NASIR v. STATE LIFE CORPORATION OF PAKISTAN 2009 PLC(CS) 362
• INAM ULLAH BAIG v. MUHAMMAD SHARIF 2009 YLR 365
• MUHAMMAD AWAIS v. State 2009 MLD 366
• ASAD AZIZ v. BAHAUDDIN ZAKARIA UNIVERSITY through Vice-Chancellor 2009 YLR 370
• SULTAN BIBI v. MUHAMMAD SARFRAZ 2009 MLD 373

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2009 →

family advocate from Parachinar lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes