Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

SHAMRAIZ AKHTAR ALIAS SHAMMA versus STATE


Section 2 302 (b) definition of evidence The ocular evidence was a permanent, unrecognizable and unreliable complainant and the accused knew each other at the complainant's mansion, his presence at the scene was natural. All material details were not contradictory to the medical evidence of the ocular account. The complainant had no specific reason to interfere with the accused in this case. False identification of the accused was not possible. Who, otherwise, was not bound by the court, in those cases, kept the accused guilty It was unclear whose death proved fatal and the benefit of the doubt should go to the accused in case of a reduction in punishment. According to the sentence of life imprisonment

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
list of supreme court advocates from Lodhran lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.