Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD AFZAL versus CHIEF SECRETARY, GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB, LAHORE

According to the Constitutional Request for Marriage Employee Policy, the transfer of a civil servant who was employed by the federal government was in this place and his wife was a teacher in the provincial government. The petition was transferred by the provincial government for transfer of the applicant's wife to the provincial government under the provincial government applicant's wife's videlock policy, which was sought to be exchanged by the LL respondent. She did not have an adult. She did not have an adult. It has been claimed that he has a right for his wife and because of the common interest of the couple together under the joint policy, the wife can apply in the department in which she has been transferred to her husband's station under the Wedlock policy. What is it. She will approach the department, the department will strictly consider such representation in accordance with the law and will decide on the same fast and accordingly \ r \ n

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2009

• MUHAMMAD ANWAR v. DIRECTOR LAHORE MUSEUM 2009 PLC(CS) 572
• MUHAMMAD FAROOQ WARIND v. PAKISTAN BAR COUNCIL through Vice-Chairman 2009 PLD 572
• Sardar SHAH NAWAZ KHAN v. MALKI AMAN 2009 PCrLJ 578
• Haji SAEED AHMED v. State 2009 YLR 579
• BAZ KHAN v. NASREEN 2009 MLD 581
• RASHID HASSAN v. State 2009 YLR 583
• GHULAM MUSTAFA v. State 2009 MLD 583
• M. SHOIB QURESHI v. Mrs. ZOHRA ZULQARNAIN 2009 PCrLJ 584

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2009 →

patent advocate from Sherani lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes