The section 302 conviction of testimony, the reduction of evidence in relation to the circumstances of the prosecution's case during the trial, was not established until both witnesses were subjected to a lengthy investigation, Trial of the trial The trial court had very appreciative testimony. The immediate reason for prosecuting the case was that a few days before the incident hearing was a direct result of the joke cut by the accused along with the victim, that the trial court correctly concluded. The complainant and other prosecution witnesses could not be established yet. False motive against the suspects that could end their family esteem The case was not a false identification of the accused who belonged to the area of the prosecution witnesses who knew them well and who was coming to their Dera incident. In anticipation of daylight they also came to light on a big day. Prosecuting witnesses have no benefit of any doubt, such as smiling face to face, contradicting words, strong, trustworthy material provided by the complainant and other prosecution witnesses, permanent and irrelevant. In the presence of the account pushed aside, thorough medical evidence and other circumstantial evidence, such as the evacuation. The location of the incident and the recovery of the pistol have been sent to the forensic science laboratory with identification and confirmation report as if the existence of matches with the test spaces in the absence of any prior hostility between the parties, this statement No importance can be given. Section 2342,
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2009
