Section 380/409 Special Judge Banking Appeals to Bank's Employees After Recording Preliminary Evidence to the Bank's Employees After Recording Initial Evidence, in which the Complainant Concerns About theft in Bank Lockers It was confirmed that, on the date of the incident of the accused, the bank was not posted to the relevant branch, who was the manager on the day of the incident, could be considered as the custodian of the highest complainant's stolen property, but not on it It was alleged that, according to the FIR, the bank was not involved in any theft or theft They were reported to have been involved, according to an unidentified group of guards who posted on the day of the incident and sat inside the branch. The guard was not a bank and agency employee who provided security. He was liable to leave his employee's act. The NT filed by the bank servicer trial court of the bank did not prove any crime nor did anyone. By the way, the suspected applicant was linked to the above incident and the effective order of seeking the applicant as the complainant was set aside in the circumstances.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2009
