Articles 3 and 5 of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199, constitution restoration of the possession was the legitimate owner of the disputed house and the respondent was unlawful possession of it as he had no documents related to the title. Attempts to justify illegal occupancy based on a contract sold by someone who was neither the landlord nor the owner was legally appointed lawyer. The special purpose of the law was to protect the rights of the owner of the lawful owner, the trial court dismissed the legal owner's complaint against the illegal occupant. The order passed by the trial court without the consent of the House, the arbitration and the judicial mind can be considered illegal and the law framed by the Supreme Court, under the constitutional jurisdiction, the order passed by the trial. As an aside, the High Court cannot be allowed to hold a Field High Court. The court and the case llowed according to the law that was remanded for his decision on merit
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2009
