MUHAMMAD FAROOQ WARIND versus PAKISTAN BAR COUNCIL THROUGH VICE-CHAIRMAN
RR 108O & 175 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional application was contrary to the order passed by the Pakistan Bar Council under which the applicant was contested to contest for the Secretary Bar of the District Bar Association. Disqualified, on the grounds that he was a full-time employee of an organization in BS-18 and thus, his choice since the returning candidate was canceled, records show that the applicant Engagement was not a legal advisor for which he was alone, but his service was of the full nature, because salary It was payable. He was entitled to certain allowances. He was bound to the duty roster. His duty hours were fixed. It had comfortable vacations, medical allowances / facilities. BS is considered acceptable under the relevant TA / DA rules if it is deemed to be within the purview of the legal advisory jurisdiction, it will be permanent and fraudulent. Performance consistent. The organization and can be described as a House Law Officer, but it cannot be assumed that the applicant did not join the service of the organization, according to Rule 108 O, the legal practitioners and bar councils of Pakistan The rules are read with KR-175. , 1976, was obliged to apply for a certificate suspension but did not, R 108 O will be automatically suspended as an Advocate Registration Certificate, irrespective of any obligation under the second Because of that he leaves it practically. Digit
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2009
