Section 13 (6) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Attack on Tenant Withdrawal Defense To sell the landlord and tenant relationship with the former owner, to sell the tenant and tenant relationship to the contractor. Rejects based on an oral agreement to do so. The controller of the premises temporarily approved the rent order but the tenant could not deposit the same amount within the stipulated time, thus the tenant's defense was terminated and the withdrawal order was approved, under which the Lower Appellate Court approved. This order was retained by the agreement whether the written rights could not be created or in favor of the landlord Landlord purchased the cover against the registered sale deed which was a field and it was a better title while in favor of the landlord. Filing of a civil suit challenging the execution of executed sales work does not fail this title Until it was finally done. The deciding tenant had also filed a claim for specific performance of the oral contract and if, on the day of the termination of the contract, the tenant was successful, he could, according to law, demand to occupy the tenant premises even though the landlord and the tenant. Beard's relationship was denied but he could not place any material on the record in support of his dispute and instead chose to disobey the order passed under section 13 of the West. In compliance with the order approved by Section 13 (6) of the West Pakistan Urban Rent Restriction Ordinance, 1959, by the Rent Controller, Pakistan Urban Rent Registration Ordinance, 1959, by the Controller of Rent.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2009
