Section 497 (2) of the Conduct Rule (XLV of 1860), Section 302/148/149 guarantee, grant of further investigation, although designated with a specific role in the FIR, but still determine the nature of such role It remains to be seen whether the accused in the FIR statement was attributed to the accused in the FIR statement as the general charges were leveled against the accused as he was not shown to be armed with any weapons but in the absence of any special charges. Neither was charged with the recovery of any kind of weapon. The role of the accused in the murder of the victim can be ascertained because the FIR was silent about it, based on the FIR statement, the accused's involvement with the commission of the crime up to that point Will not be justified unless certain allegations are made against it. According to police records, it was not shown that the victim was killed due to any injury by the accused. The mere delusion of the crime does not necessarily mean that the accused was involved. In this case, when no specific role was specified, the case against the accused was a further investigation into his crime, so the accused confessed on bail. was done
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2009
