The Section 8 trial was filed by the trial court, but the appellate court below allowed the trial court's decision and order aside, allowing the defendant to file an appeal and dismissing the dispute in the case and The record on litigation was fully established. The plaintiff was the owner of the plot in this case which decides and adjudicates the proceedings and oral evidence of the documents presented by the parties to the civil affairs. On this principle, the evidence presented by the plaintiff had clearly enhanced the evidence presented by the defendant's rule that under the Transfer of Property Act, 1882, every document worth Rs 100 was required to be registered, establishing ownership. Was not absolute when doing. The convincing evidence of any record cannot be dismissed on this basis alone. The penalty for non-registration was punishable by a fine, but it cannot be used as a weapon to seize the legal property of the other party, as it has been fully owned. The plots discussed were entitled to take such an uncontested decision and the order passed by the appellate court was set aside and the trial court's order and order restored.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2009
