MUHAMMAD UMAIR MIRZA versus VICE-CHANCELLOR, BAHA-UD-DIN ZAKARIA UNIVERSITY, .MULTAN
Article 199 Constitutional Appeal The applicant was issued a showcase notice using unfair means in the educational institution examination alleging that he used an additional response sheet on the examination on which the relevant material was written and That he was found guilty of smuggling extra answer books in the exam hall. Applicant violations of the relevant Code of Conduct were disqualified for a period of three years from passing the examination and participating in any University examination before the applicant provided him / her an opportunity. Without a request was dismissed, the dealing officer, along with the officials present in the court, failed to satisfy the court at this point, whether the inquiry officer could find out that the alleged response sheet in the hands of the applicant was educational. Like mothers and students are born at the mercy of such institutions; it is the student's basic duty They will abide by maintaining highly treated s behavior, honest approach to the company's reputation with its responsibility and agency regulations. Institutions should treat their students like mothers. And if a student commits a mistake and violates the rules and regulations of the institution, then punishment was required, if necessary, to the extent that his career was not destroyed. First, thorough investigation and inquiry should be done. In the present case to protect the future of the student, the applicant was undoubtedly caught red-handed in the examination hall, with an additional answer sheet.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2009
