Section 13 and 15 (6) of the landlord and tenant, regarding the extent of the proof of the land, the appellant denied the landlord and the tenant that he was not a tenant in the shop number mentioned by the claimant in his dismissal application. And claims to be a tenant in an affiliate shop. The lower appellate court referred the matter to the rental controller who had no ownership of the land, appointing a local commissioner to do the land boundary, both shops were connected / adjacent to each other and the dispute was decided in connection with the shop. Otherwise, the Rent Controller may adopt any method for resolving disputes, keeping in view the facts of each case. The lower appellate court rightly concluded that the rent controller should appoint a local commissioner to set the land boundary. The appellant failed to identify any jurisdiction, legal instability, material mismanagement. Stay. The High Court refused to interfere with the findings presented by the lower appellate court remanding the controller to the case rental and accordingly the appeal while maintaining the remand order. Excluded
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2009
