STATE LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH CHAIRMAN versus MST. ANWAR GULZAR
Section 118 and 124 appealed to the High Court Counsel to seek damages, along with a request for payment of death claims, when responding that a final decision was approved in any case, without a pending decision not legally binding. , Then they confessed and said that the appellant was delaying the case with unlawful postponement, so that the defendant could be denied his legitimate claim, which on the basis of a valid insurance policy the parties agreed. Had arrived That the adjudication decision and order should be settled with the result that the respondents' case with the request of the appellant to summon the witness is considered pending. That the lawyer for the defendant will oppose the request for the witnesses to be summoned. That the Tribunal will decide the application for the first time through a speech order and then proceed in this matter. The Tribunal should be directed to resolve this request as soon as possible. The impeachment order / decision was held with the result that the applicant's request, along with the defendant's request, would be considered pending before the tribunal before the tribunal decides this request. Applicant's request and then respondent's request
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2009
