Find a Lawyer

MST. MUMTAZ BEGUM versus MUHAMMAD SHAFIQUE

Section 18 of the West Pakistan Land Revenue Act (XVII of 1967), S 163 is a felony on an order obtained by a fraudster, if the same case falls within the purview of Section 18, the Limitation Act, 1908. Challenge under the statute of limitations. , Its requirements must be stated in the plaintiff / petition and if a particular law is governed by a particular law which sets its own boundary period, such law should adhere to the principles. ? \ r \ n

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2009

• LIAQAT ALI v. State 2009 PCrLJ 413
• KHURSHID BIBI v. Ch. M. NAZIR CHEEMA 2009 PLD 415
• MUHAMMAD NAZIR v. FAQIR MUHAMMAD 2009 CLC 416
• Mst. MUSARRAT BIBI v. S.H.O. 2009 YLR 418
• Mst. KALSOOM BIBI v. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BAHAWALPUR 2009 MLD 421
• STATE LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION OF PAKISTAN through Chairman v. Mst. ANWAR GULZAR 2009 CLD 425
• BANK ALFALAH LIMITED v. ADMINISTRATOR GENERAL, ZAKAT ADMINISTRATION, GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN, ISLAMABAD 2009 PLD 426
• WATEEN TELECOM (PVT.) LTD., through Attorney v. Malik ABDUL AHAD 2009 PLD 429

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2009 →

best law firms from Muzaffargarh lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes