NATIONAL BANK OF PAKISTAN, THE MALL, LAHORE versus MUHAMMAD AKRAM KHAN
Section 96 and IX of the 100 Limitation Act (8 of 1908), Section Second Appeal Delay Deleted by the Appellate Court Before the Impact of the Procedure Before the Impact of the Appeal Court by Appeal by Appeal to the Court of Appeal Had already been filed by the High Court. The appellate court dismissed the appeal filed by the appellant for which the restriction was imposed. Appellant's jurisdiction was not appropriate for the High Court to pressurize in the appeal case, after the High Court's first order for the return of the appeal, there was no good reason for the appellant to re-appeal the appeal and appropriate Due to delay in reaching the forum, the appellant was prosecuting the appeal before the High Court without any probable cause and justification and wasted time in withdrawing and correcting the appeal memorandum. It was more than 28 months, therefore, there was no justification for delay in the High Court decision. Was banned, the second appeal was dismissed in circumstances
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2009
