KOUSAR PERVEEN ALIAS SHAMEEM versus MUHAMMAD FAYYAZ
Article 25 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional Request Different Opinion on the Evidence of Juvenile Detention Men Minor Age All were above the age of 7 and were studying in English medium school at the time of their parents' dismissal. Provided evidence that he was worried about the future of minors and intended to provide them with better schooling and facilities The Guardian Judge, after recording the evidence, believed that the welfare of minors toward his father. Was taken into custody by a mother who raised her. It would be permissible to harm the parents' scenario and the future of the minors, while appreciating the evidence could not be taken differently by the High Court in the constitutional jurisdiction. Was taking care of In the custody of the father, priority should be given to all children above the age of 7, as they were in the order approved by the two courts below for the convenience and arrangement of the schools. Was neither illegal nor weak, the petition dismissing the circumstances demanding the High Court's intervention in the exercise of constitutional jurisdiction
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2009
