DR. ZAFAR ALI KHAN versus ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, LAHORE
Article 5 and Schedule to the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitution Petition for Revenue of Revenue Petitioner was a qualified doctor who lived in two separate houses with two wives, having already entered into a marriage contract with four women. And went abroad and after the divorce from the defendant, the restitution allowance granted to the defendant by the Family Court entering into another marriage was extended by the lower appellate court to the effect of the divorce, up to 6000 rupees. The proof of the applicant's validity was not credible that he would receive only Rs 7000 as salary. That is, while retaining the two families, the rate of reinstatement allowance raised by the lower appellate court on appeal was not by the applicants or otherwise bloody source or the source of the husband's or father's income was hardly any reasonable in the context of rehabilitation. Was the basis, so as to justify interference with the results. The judgment and decision recorded by the courts was in accordance with the Palette Court law passed by the Lower A and the High Court, based on the evidence, exercised constitutional jurisdiction, refused to interfere with the decision and approved the lower appellate court. The order made was deleted in the circumstances
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2009
