Section 2 302 (b) / evidence 34 The defendant accused of defining the evidence was immediately named in the FIR, with the effective role of injuring the firearm on the head of the complainant's daughter-in-law. Eyewitnesses, including the complainant, proved this fact correctly. Their evidence is on record, which was proven by medical evidence that the accused could not be robbed of the potential for accountability by means of medical evidence, either by disbelief or simply by the non-recovery of the crime weapon, especially when at home. This incident occurred in the light. The victim was found guilty in a thick-lipped area, but it was unclear what happened between the victim and the suspect before the incident; the suspect had no connection with the alleged motive and the complainant too. The death sentence of the accused was changed to life imprisonment according to the compromise made at the time of the incident.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2009
