Find a Lawyer

HAYAT KHAN versus STATE

The approval of the agreement between the parties, which was put on record, indicates that the dispute between the parties was civil, before the arrest of Sections 498, the Code of Conduct (XLV of 1860), Sections 419, 468 and 471. The case was pending in a court of competent jurisdiction; bail before the arrest, which had already been granted to the accused, was confirmed.

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2009

• SAIMA ASLAM v. ASIF TUFAIL 2009 YLR 552
• KHURSHEED BEGUM v. INAM-UR-REHMAN KHAN 2009 PLD 552
• MUHAMMAD FIYAZ v. State 2009 YLR 552
• ARSHAD ALI v. EXECUTIVE DISTRICT OFFICER (REVENUE), PAKPATTAN SHA.RIF 2009 YLR 558
• JAVAID MAJEED v. SOHALA MUSSARAT 2009 MLD 561
• MUHAMMAD ASIF v. State 2009 YLR 561
• NATIONAL BANK OF PAKISTAN, THE MALL, LAHORE v. MUHAMMAD AKRAM KHAN 2009 CLC 561
• YAQOOB alias BHUGI v. State 2009 PCrLJ 563

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2009 →

tax advocates from Khanpur lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes