Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

WASEEM IQBAL versus STATE


Section 497 (2) of the Conduct Rule (XLV of 1860), Section 302/34 bail, the name of the further investigating suspect's grant was not listed in the FIR, but it was subsequently filed with the complainant about six months later. It was included on the basis of additional statement. The prosecution allegedly saw the witnesses' statements against the witnesses under Section 161 for the last time and collected evidence in the form of extra-judicial admission, which was recorded six months after the CRPC incident. It was six months ago that he saw the victim in the company of the accused. Why the witnesses remained silent for so long until the date of the incident, and said that information was not provided to the victim's relatives or the police, the prosecution participant was recently arrested and charged. It was yet to appear before the court that the trial was going to be held in the near future. As punishment, the bars were admitted on bail to the accused in the circumstances

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
Pakistan, top advocate family court from Pishin lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.