Find a Lawyer

AMIR IQBAL CHAUDHARY versus STATE

Section 497 Determination Code (XLV of 1860), Section 489F guarantee, finding of contradiction between the parties to a contractual claim was found and the FIR civil suit related to the dispute between the parties was also pending in civil. Was. The accused has been in judicial custody for the past 4 months and the challan was also presented in court, no further investigation was needed for the allegation and no offense against the accused came under the prohibited section of section 497. Under the circumstances, the CCP suspect was admitted on bail

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2009

• WAQAS SHAH v. State 2009 PCrLJ 151
• MUHAMMAD ASHRAF v. FAIZ ALI 2009 YLR 153
• BASHARAT ALI v. State 2009 PCrLJ 153
• WASEEM IQBAL v. State 2009 MLD 154
• Mst. AISHA BIBI v. PRINCIPAL, GOVERNMENT ELEMENTARY TEACHERS\' TRAINING COLLEGE FOR WOMEN, MULTAN 2009 CLC 156
• MUHAMMAD ASHRAF v. State 2009 PCrLJ 157
• MEHMOOD AHMED v. GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB through Secretary LG&CD Lahore 2009 PLD 157
• COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX v. PAK ARAB FERTILIZER (PVT.) LTD. MULTAN 2009 PTD 157

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2009 →

best law firm from Okara lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes