Section 497 (2) Prohibited (Enforcement Hadith) Order (4 of 1979), Arts 3/4 Bail, Grant of Further Investigation Grant accused Although police seized him in the possession of a large quantity of alcohol, he was caught red handed, The IR revealed that the suspect was carrying 50 liters of alcohol in a can of gallons. It was practically impossible to keep 50 liters of wine in a gallon of cans with only a capacity of 4 5 liters. There was no other available that could contain 50 liters of alcohol. FIR is impossible, untrue, false, fabricated and incredible. The Article 3 Prohibition (Enforcement of Head) Order, 1979, was not attracted for the present reasons because it stated that there were Article Deals relating to the manufacture and sale of alcohol and in the present case Article 3 of the Ordinance. None of the components were attracted because there is no manufacturing evidence. Or that the liquor sale was on the record, the police did not recover any money from the accused, which may prove the fact that he had declared Article 4 of the Prohibition (Enforcement Head) Order 1979 a non-bailable offense. The suspect was allegedly arrested during the day and the police could easily link any independent witness to the eligible area in the search process, which was not done in this case, a clear violation of section 103. In the CCP, the false involvement of the accused could not be ruled out. In the case of further questioning of the accused, the accused was admitted on bail in the case
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2009
