Section 2 (2 (b) / 34 34) The definition of evidence was an unrecognizable role presented by the ocular account witness who had no motive against the accused nor had any special relationship with the complainant. Concerning this incident, it is probably the duty of the individual to find out that in his early youth the first evidence in connection with the brutal murder of two innocent brothers is the natural, direct and trustworthy of the said witness. The victim was admitted as a solid piece of evidence, which provided full support for the statement to the complainant, and the medical evidence on record Yes, the disclosure of the cause of death to the victim (complainant) after the fatal injury by the deceased can be declared as a safe dying declaration, neither the person nor the complainant has There was no reason for the accused to be wrongly involved in the case and the complainant was fully supported by the said witness with the final evidence along with the deceased declaration, it was not delayed nor did the deceased give a tutor. Who was not sure of its survival, therefore, the value of the said declaration could not be underestimated. Before its original sibling defense version appears as a chicken and bull story, there is no supporting evidence on the record from any independent piece of evidence that is evidence of motivation or otherwise There was no result or consistency where the ocular account was set up in a completely clean, honest and straightforward statement. The facts of the prosecution's investigating officers have led to prosecution at all levels
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2009
