KHYALI KHAN versus THE STATE THROUGH SUPERINTENDENT CUSTOMS (ASO), LAHORE
Section 497 (2) Customs Act (IV of 1969), Sections 156 (1) (89), 16 and 178 bail, the grant of further investigation role on the accused persons was that while they were carrying smuggled goods. One of the defendants claimed ownership of the seized clothing, which was withdrawn under Section 156 (1) (89) of the Customs Act 1969, under which the accused was sentenced to six years imprisonment. Was gone Section 497 (1), CCP clause was not attracted; in the circumstances the relevant authority confiscated the alleged smuggled cloth and it has not yet been determined whether the goods recovered from the accused were smuggled. Or not. Section 156 (1) (89) of the Customs Act, 1969 was drawn up. Otherwise, it is necessary to determine whether the accused was merely the driver of the vehicle or took any interest in the case of the accused. Are. The Enseys came under further scrutiny, they were granted bail to the accused entitled to bail privileges, under the circumstances \ r \ n
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2009
