Find a Lawyer

BAYRAM AVARI versus PRESIDING OFFICER, PUNJAB LABOUR COURT NO.9, MULTAN

The appeal from the Section 48 High Court employer was demanded in a Labor Court-approved question order, allowing employees to set up the Labor Appellate Tribunal under section 555555 of the Industrial Relations Act, 1 of 2. It was appropriate that the employer should approach the forum instead of adjourning the matter, instructing the employer to be dealt with within the stipulated time with the direction of filing an appeal before the Labor Appellate Tribunal, Enable the employer to contact the relevant forum.

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2009

• MUHAMMAD SHEHZAD v. State 2009 MLD 348
• KHYALI KHAN v. THE STATE through Superintendent Customs (ASO), Lahore 2009 MLD 356
• KARAMAT ALI SHAHZAD v. MUHAMMAD ZULQARNAIN 2009 PLD 356
• ZAHID IQBAL v. State 2009 YLR 356
• BASHIR AHMAD v. MUHAMMAD HASSAN 2009 MLD 359
• MUHAMMAD SHAFQAT v. SHAHNAZ BIBI 2009 PLD 359
• ZARINA BEGUM v. SECRETARY EDUCATION 2009 PLC(CS) 359
• SHAMRAIZ AKHTAR alias SHAMMA v. State 2009 PCrLJ 361

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2009 →

online advocate from Pak Pattan Sharif lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes