Section 497 (2) Crimes of Adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance (VII VI of 1979), Section 10/16 bail, accused in further investigation, was, of course, designated with a specific role in the FIR, but High The court had to deny that the facts and circumstances of the case, whether or not the accused was prosecuted, were not present in the record, direct or indirect evidence that could link the accused to the commission. The allegations were falsified by a four-day delay in filing an FIR. In this case, the allegations leveled against the accused and the possibility of making false accusations against the accused could not be ruled out. If this was indeed a kidnapping then there was no reason for the complainant not to file an FIR immediately. The medical evidence was of no importance because the kidnapper was a married woman, it is not known whether the sealed stems collected by the prosecution were exactly what the accused was, no grouping. It could not be ascertained whether it was the accused who committed adultery and forced his acquittal. Rum was charged with further investigation, he was admitted on bail
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2009
