Section 5, Schedule and Section 14 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional application for recovery of restitution allowance, suitability for recovery of minor restitution allowance filed by the minor and his mother to the family court The verdict was awarded while giving the plaintiff a restitution allowance. The minor plaintiff had the right to receive fixed care allowance at the rate of one thousand rupees per month until the age of puberty or her marriage, which was earlier and a 20% annual increase from the date of the institution of the minor's mother. Was also allowed by the defendant to be eligible for rehabilitation for a period of three months up to that period. The defendant preferred the appeal against the Family Court decision and decree only to the extent of the minor and did not challenge the judgment and order passed in favor of the minor's mother. The appellate court dismissed, saying that no appeal was made against the judgment and injunction of Mintina. The defendant's opinion of Rs. 1,000 or less was that when the appeal against the judgment / decree was filed. One thousand + 1,000 rupees (one thousand for the minor and one thousand rupees for the minor's mother), he was also authorized to make the judgment for himself and the order of the minor's mother to the extent of the decree And challenged the decision of the appeal and ordered the duchess of Rs. 1,000 only to the extent of the minor, if the defendant had given the entire decree passed by the Family Court. Thousands had challenged notes (1000+ 1000). It was worth it because Section 14 (2) (c) of the West Pakistan Family Courts Act, 1964, completely speaks of this decree and not the appeal for the amount of each head was disqualified at a rate of Rs.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2009
