MUHAMMAD HUSSAIN versus NATIONAL BANK OF PAKISTAN THROUGH ASSISTANT VICE PRESIDENT/CHIEF MANAGER
Sections 9, 12 and 22 of the Limitation Act (IX of 1908), suit for recovery of section 5 debt, ex parte decree, petition filed by the plaintiff bank by the plaintiff bank were dismissed, the defendant for the trial Ali had filed an application against him leaving such an earlier order, which was requested under section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1908, in the absence of the respondent. The request for leave was dismissed; the request could not be decided without the hearing of the defendant on the basis stated in the order or his lawyer, whose absence Gai's appeal was explained in the affidavit filed by the lawyer, along with that it was set aside, the result will be considered pending and the judge's banking court will decide after hearing the parties. ?
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2009
