Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD AMIN versus FAUZIA IKRAM

Sections 9 and 17A Sue for the dissolution of marriage, restitution allowance and recovery of dowry articles. Defendant's defense endorsement was to file a written statement on the first date of his appeal, but he was doing his best to frustrate the progress of the filed claims. Through his wife; he was given the opportunity to file a written statement at the last but he showed irregularities and hence he was burdened with expenses that were not paid, so the defendants had their right. Lost and the order to close his defense was quite legitimate. Under Section 17A, the West Pakistan Family Courts Act, 1964, the allowance was also legal

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2009

• ANWAR BIBI v. BOARD OF REVENUE PUNJAB through Member Colonies 2009 YLR 1035
• Sheikh MUHAMMAD KHALID v. MALIK FOOD INDUSTRIES through Sole Proprietor 2009 CLD 1038
• SALAHUD-DIN-AYYUBI v. State 2009 MLD 1039
• ASIF MEHMOOD v. State 2009 YLR 1040
• NOOR MUHAMMAD v. ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, MIANWALI 2009 CLC 1042
• TANVEER HUSSAIN QURESHI v. DISTRICT PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, SIALKOT 2009 PCrLJ 1043
• IFTIKHAR HUSSAIN v. ALLAH RAKHA 2009 MLD 1044
• ATTIQUE REHMAN v. ENVIRONMENTAL TRIBUNALS 2009 CLD 1048

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2009 →

family advocate from Neelam lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes