TANVEER HUSSAIN QURESHI versus DISTRICT PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, SIALKOT
Section 365/382/342/148/149 Punjab Criminal Prosecution Service (Constitution, Duties and Powers) Act (Constitution of 2006), Sections 9 and 10 of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional Request District Public Prosecutor Revoked While investigating the report of the case, the investigating officer did not agree with this matter and directed the section HO to file the accused for trial in the court pursuant to sections 9 and 10 of the legality of the Punjab criminal prosecution. Invoice under Section 1173, CCPC. The Service (Constitution, Duties and Powers) Act, 2006, requires a public prosecutor to file a departmental inquiry or criminal case against a competent court for filing a report / invoice under section 173, CR PC. Not allowed to recommend The Inspector Public Prosecutor did not have the power, control, and authority to overturn the trial court's jurisdiction, and he traveled beyond that by issuing the aforesaid instructions for jurisdiction and section H, in connection with a serious illegal action. It was committed and the public prosecutor's job was to identify only the errors that are in the report along with the investigation and will direct the investigating agency to remove the same trial court. Orders on the cancellation report may also issue necessary instructions after an investigation by the Investigation Officer and after examining the material available for submission of the challan against the accused prosecutor and any scope for directing Section H in a similar case. Was not an option and the decision was made under a constitutional request. Was accepted accordingly
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2009
