GULZAR AHMAD versus SUPERINTENDENT DISTRICT JAIL, FAISALABAD
Sections 392 and 411 of the Criminal Code (V 1898), Sections 35, 397 and 561 were tried together with the trial court admitting the accused in five different cases under Sections 392 and 411, PPC. Was punished for the crime. In each case, but no order was passed that directed the execution of the convictions in different cases to be carried out simultaneously, although the accused was a harsh and guilty man who committed the crimes of the robbery in a terrible and horrific manner. Yes, in every case he is the least convicted. The three-year RI provided under Section 392, PPC, under the trial court, allegedly did not challenge his convictions and convictions before the High Court through appeal or revision because of his confessional statement and hence The High Court could not get the PRC's approval under Section 555A. In all the cases sought for relief, the accused were tried on separate and separate offenses and their facts were not related to each other. He was repeatedly accused of robbery and related crimes and did not deserve that his convictions should be ordered to run concurrently in these cases.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2009
