Section 302/324/148/149 Criminal Code of Conduct (V9 1898), the reason for submitting the appeal against Section 417 Breath to the complainant's lawyer was that the accused had injured the deceased on his left ear. Presenting a lawyer for the complainant did not go off the record. As it was clearly stated in the FIR that the accused had injured the body of the prosecutor's witness and was sentenced to two years imprisonment, the prosecution improved such version of the trial. The victim had a minor injury to her left ear. The trial court charged the accused for the reasons presented in the affidavit, they were guilty, respectful and convinced that once the verdict of acquittal was recorded, the accused took double advantage of the innocence. Unless strong and unusual circumstances, this decision cannot be interfered with. At present, an innocent trial court acquitted the accused in the circumstances of the High Court's interference bail investigation.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2009
