Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD SAEED versus STATE

Pre-arrest Guarantee, Section 338A (XLV of 1860), Section 337A (i) / 337L (2) / 337F (v) / 337F (i) / 148/149 from the accused under Section 337A Grant (i) of the said offense, PPC was guaranteed and in such cases, the sanction of bail was a rule and the refusal was exempt. The defendant's party also filed a case alleging that the complaining party had dealt with the aggression, and thus, his case was profound. The version and it was not yet settled in the trial which party needed further investigation into the crime against the accused in the other case against the accused.

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2009

• ASGHAR ALI v. State 2009 PCrLJ 1060
• JAHANGIR v. MANZOOR AHMAD 2009 MLD 1062
• BATA PAKISTAN LIMITED through Managing Director v. AHMED SAEED AWAN 2009 YLR 1066
• GULZAR AHMAD v. SUPERINTENDENT DISTRICT JAIL, FAISALABAD 2009 MLD 1068
• IMRAN v. State 2009 YLR 1071
• SAFDAR ALI v. State 2009 YLR 1074
• MUMTAZ AHMAD v. State 2009 PCrLJ 1077
• SAFDAR HUSSAIN v. JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE 2009 YLR 1078

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2009 →

divorce advocates from Mamu kunjan lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes