Section 497 (2) of the Conduct Code (XLV of 1860), Section 392/395/412 bail, the grant of further inquiry was not designated in the FIR and was included in the case in the supplementary statement, no parade of identification at any time. Was not held. The two women who were present at the scene of the incident were also not presented for evidence, nor did they identify the two accused nor any other direct or indirect evidence on record against the accused related to the commission of the crime. Was not present, the co-accused was already granted bail. The reason for the trial court's refusal of the accused and the defendant's bail was that the recovery of a ring of earrings from the suspect had an impact, according to the FIR statement that several gold ornaments as well as household articles were stolen and The total amount of the stolen articles mentioned was around two lakhs while the allegedly only one ring was recovered. Could not recover if he had recovered the remaining articles, then it could be assumed that the accused was involved in theft. Involved in taking, especially when her house did not identify the prisoners and the prosecution did not have. The suspect managed to hold an identity parade as the suspect further investigated his crime, he was also admitted on bail under the circumstances.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2009
