Section 2302 (b) Definition of Evidence Sentencing, the reduction of the Council for the accused did not challenge the accused's conviction for the murder of the victim, but only prayed for the reduction of his sentence to the complainant and the prosecutor. The witness gave a general statement of the incident, and precise statements about the role that the aforementioned witnesses played in the Ocular account of the murder were independently supported by this purpose, and it also obtained medical evidence. Enough help was given, which confirmed the date and time of the incident. The aforementioned eyewitnesses alleged in their statement under Section 34 used, the CCP accepted the death of the deceased, but admitted that the murder was serious and sudden provocation by him. Is. If an accused makes a special or general plea, then the attack is set on establishing the circumstances, and the agency and the court supporting his request said that the absence of these circumstances should be considered. No independent witness or evidence was produced by the accused to establish the circumstances supporting his grave and sudden provocation; in the case, the accused was charged, failing to discharge that responsibility. had lived. In this regard, the trial court had sufficiently justified finding the accused under section 2 (b (b), PPC) guilty of the murder of the deceased and the accused was not challenged. The lawyer for the case was fairly fair and justified, although it has been said that the accused was acquitted in connection with the murder of another victim on the basis of compromise, but has been sentenced to death. I q
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2009
