Find a Lawyer

SYED WAJEEH UL HASSAN versus BAHA-UD-DIN ZAKRIYA UNIVERSITY, MULTAN

Article 199 Constitutional Application Re-evaluation of Institutional Response Books Principals were dissatisfied with the evaluation of their response books and would like to re-examine the same fact that any fraud or fraud against the examiner. In the absence, retrospective books cannot be re-examined. Work was done only to the satisfaction of the candidate, on the candidate's representation, it was practiced to re-examine the answer sheets and there was no contradiction in the marks of the various questions and they were collectively found that the candidate I had the opportunity to inspect the sheets but not before the authorities. Neither had any tester before the High Court revealed any wrongdoing or misconduct in checking the answer books or violating any of the authorities' rules; Was not entitled to be examined.

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2009

• Agha QAIS v. State 2009 PCrLJ 1334
• MUHAMMAD NAWAZ v. State 2009 MLD 1340
• MEHMOOD ALAM v. State 2009 PCrLJ 1342
• ICC TEXTILES LIMITED through Authorized Representative v. WATER AND POWER DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (WAPDA), WAPDA HOUSE, LAHORE through Chairman 2009 CLC 1343
• MUHAMMAD ZUBAIR IQBAL v. State 2009 PCrLJ 1349
• MUHAMMAD ASHRAF alias KALI v. State 2009 PCrLJ 1351
• ARZU MAND v. State 2009 YLR 1352
• ALTAF HUSSAIN v. ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, BHALWAL 2009 YLR 1356

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2009 →

ask a advocate free from Pirpai lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes