Article 9 (c) Police Order (22 of 2002), Article 18 Police Rules, 1934, R25 2 (3) Appreciating the evidence The investigating officer being a neutral authority cannot be the complainant and the witness in this case. Which he was investigating, as shown by Article 18 of the Police Order, Article 18 of 2002 and R25 2 (3) of the Police Rules, 1934, so the investigation was not fair, honest and transparent where the investigating officer had complained Served as a distributor and a raiding officer, the defense will be deprived of its most valuable rights and will not be forced to rely on it. The non-production of the trial property in the court was fatal to the prosecution's case, which dismissed this chemical examiner's own basic report, based on the prosecution's case, section 2342, CRPC. In his statement not being put before the accused, he missed the opportunity to explain the aforesaid evidence, alleging that the accused was acquitted in the circumstances.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2009
