IMTIAZ RASHEED QURESHI versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF POWER, ISLAMABAD
Arts 199 and 25 constitutional submissions Load shedding The applicant believed that load shedding / management was being treated with extreme discrimination, as some privileges, institutions were exempted from the indirect immunity behind it, while the entire nation. Was having trouble Loadshedding, which was disproportionate, unacceptable and unannounced, caused the poorest people in the country to suffer due to load shedding in the heat of summer. He also cited the catastrophic impact of the country's industrial and agricultural sectors on this account, particularly in the case of financial loss, unemployment and rising prices of essential commodities, the petitioner suggested. Was to set up a commission for the High Court to look into all these aspects and to propose the loadshedding / administration, which should be governed by the court's order of accuracy, the planning and management of the load management, Depending on many factors, there was a tendency for such volatility. Only relevant authorities can get the job. It was decided by such authorities, which department, organization, institution, establishment, area, (geographical or industrial, agricultural or otherwise) should be targeted when the schedule of load shedding was not such Was. Such action cannot be questioned by the authorities on the touchstone of Article 25 of the Constitution Chart on record, as being irrational, irrational or dishonestly malicious. The decision was not arbitrary or serious. Rather, severe energy shortages were made in forced conditions.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2009
