Section 5, Schedule and Section 14 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Case of Constitutional Request for Care Allowance Plaintiff, who begins to live separately from the plaintiff's husband charged with his minor children, for himself and his minor children. Filing a lawsuit for restitution allowance. The court ordered the suit and allowed maintenance at a rate of Rs 1000 per month, however, to the extent of the plaintiff's wife, the order was up to the expiry of the period of the plaintiff's divorce from the institution. Not willing to live with the defendant and living away from it with no reasonable excuse, the defendant demanded that his parents live separately with their husbands' residence. The plaintiff was the only son of his parents who depended on it. The plaintiff, asking the defendant to leave her parents' home, was not justified in having the right to live and care for her son - leaving her older parents alone and economically or socially unaware. Throwing in buses was not justified by the ethics, social ethics and even the lawsuit demanded by the plaintiff. The circumstances, however, were unfair and the refusal to appear with the defendant prevented him from receiving the restitution allowance from the court in the circumstances, the courts below, favoring the restitution allowance in law or in accordance with the facts. Did not justify the pass in favor of. The plaintiff's unclean decisions were, in the circumstances, invalidated to the extent that the plaintiff was granted restitution allowance, and were set aside \ r \ n
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2009
