Clauses 2) 2 (b) / 32?4 / 8 45 evidence / ?8 App / ?9 ????? The accused was charged with the definition of evidence, neither was he aware of earlier witnesses, nor was his name listed in the FIR And was arrested in some other cases and cleared without trial. They showed the prosecution witnesses during the lockup in the police lockup during the identification parade examination, their identity fell to the ground, in the absence of a parade, in the FIR and during the first stage of the investigation. Yes, the prosecution's case was against four other accused, but later the investigating officer added the three current suspects without collecting any legal evidence against them, the investigating officer prosecuted the star's injured after the victim's wife. The first statement of the witnesses was recorded. More than a month after the incident, though, she appeared before the complainant at the time of filing an FIR and at the time of an investigation, it was reported that the injured witness was already in custody against the unknown accused. In a statement without his identity parade against the unknown accused, no legal justification was given to record his conviction, however, his benefit was minimal, however, the accused was in favor of the trial court. In violation of the aforementioned rule of law, he recorded false accusations and convictions on the basis of allegations and assumptions, giving the prosecutor the benefit of the doubt and the accused was acquitted.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2009
