Find a Lawyer

EHTASHAM-UL-HAQ versus STATE

Section 497 Determination Code (XLV of 1860), Section 302/34 bail, defendant's denial was designated in the FIR witnesses saw the accused strangled with the accused, medical report supported the prosecution's version Yes, Moto helped further in this case. The accused was found guilty during the interrogation, deep definition of evidence was not valid during the bail phase. There is ample evidence on record in support of the prosecution's case; Guaranteed by reason. The minor dispute, which was not justified, was denied bail under the circumstances

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2009

• MUSTAFA v. State 2009 YLR 1375
• MUHAMMAD ARIF MIAN v. ABDUL HAFEEZ 2009 PCrLJ 1379
• MUHAMMAD HUSSAIN v. CHAIRMAN, NATIONAL HIGHWAY AUTHORITY, ISLAMABAD 2009 MLD 1381
• SHAKEEL AHMAD v. ABDUL GHAFFAR 2009 YLR 1384
• MUHAMMAD ASLAM v. NATIONAL BANK OF PAKISTAN 2009 CLD 1389
• MUHAMMAD AKBAR alias ABBI v. State 2009 YLR 1391
• LIAQUAT ALI v. MUHAMMAD SAEED 2009 MLD 1391
• IMTIAZ RASHEED QURESHI v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary, Ministry of Power, Islamabad 2009 CLC 1391

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2009 →

family advocate from Garh More lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes