Subject to the Section 12 suit trial for the specific performance of the contract, but the appellate court dismissed the case allowing the appeal, the oral evidence presented by the plaintiff was completely proportional to the plaintiff's version. There was enough documentation to maintain a binding contract between a legitimate and the parties, especially when it was executed in court, contradictory evidence presented by the defendant merely indicated that it The components of a proper contract offer, consideration, and acceptance are, at the touchstone of the aforementioned requirements. , The agreement was fully established as a valid and binding agreement, the appellate court's proportional decision was, in the circumstances, expressly unlawful and could not sustain the decisions and decree passed by the appellate court, Was set aside and the trial court's verdict and verdict was restored \ r \ n
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2009
