GHULAM MURTAZA versus ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, NAROWAL
For the specific performance of the Section 12 Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908), the provisional relief agreement for sale of OXXX, RR1 and 2 suits, the application for injunctive relief was arbitrary in nature and depended on the preliminary issue. , The balance of convenience and the irreplaceable. The Damage Trial Court rejected the plea for ineffective relief primarily because the evidence needed to be deeply examined in order to ascertain the authenticity of the agreement contained in the case or otherwise. The seller's contract could not create a title for a potential seller. The components of the interim injunction separately in favor of the defendants were not in favor of the plaintiff. The findings were confirmed by the appellate court. Harmony was against detection. The plaintiff was not identified for any material illegality, irregularity and / or deviation from the process. Outside, the application was dismissed.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2009
