Section 302/34 Criminal Code of Conduct (V9 1898), Section 417 (2A) appeal to the United Kingdom Prosecution failed to prove the motive for the murder of the accused by any free and invisible evidence, and the real brother's only As the statement was an interesting witness, the trial was of no avail, the extra-judicial confession on the nature of a defendant's allegation of immunity was unacceptable, and any touchstone of the criminal administration of justice was not shared with the accused. Against this, it cannot be regarded as proof. Other criminal material was collected against the accused, initially complaining about the murder of her husband, but was later presented as an accused because of the joint request of all the brothers of the victim's record. It was not identified how it was moved from the calendar of the prosecution's witnesses to the charges of exporting a pistol from Sai. The suspects did not associate him with the commission of the crime because after the trial, the trial court acquitted the accused. The reasons presented for this were neither trivial nor were the reasons given by a competent court after their victory. Was charged twice with his guilt. The appeal against the guilty verdict was dismissed in the circumstances.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2009
