Find a Lawyer

BANK ALFALAH LIMITED versus ADMINISTRATOR GENERAL, ZAKAT ADMINISTRATION, GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN, ISLAMABAD

Section 2 (xxiii) (n) and 3 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional petition Zakat, the deduction of the amount deposited on the court's direction, the petitioner complained that the question in the pending judgment deposited the money in question. Was done And after the verdict, the authorities deducted the zakat from the original amount so that the judgment of the court regarding the amount or use of the property kept by the court was decided by the pending zakah and section 2 of the usher (xxiii). ) N was in the naughty end of the deletion. Ordinance, 1980; Since this term does not require any zakah charge as a term exclusion from the curriculum, and consequently the zakat principal in the investment under the orders of the Supreme Court and then under the orders of the High Court. Will be an act of authority in deducting the actual amount from. Without legal authority and void

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2009

• Mst. MUSARRAT BIBI v. S.H.O. 2009 YLR 418
• Mst. MUMTAZ BEGUM v. MUHAMMAD SHAFIQUE 2009 PLD 418
• Mst. KALSOOM BIBI v. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BAHAWALPUR 2009 MLD 421
• STATE LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION OF PAKISTAN through Chairman v. Mst. ANWAR GULZAR 2009 CLD 425
• WATEEN TELECOM (PVT.) LTD., through Attorney v. Malik ABDUL AHAD 2009 PLD 429
• SIKANDAR HAYAT v. Mst. NARGIS PARVEEN 2009 CLC 429
• Subedar IMTIAZ AHMED v. Mst. FARZANA BIBI 2009 PCrLJ 430
• GUJRANWALA STEEL FURNACE, SIALKOT through Authorized Representative v. CHAIRMAN, FEDERAL BOARD OF REVENUE, ISLAMABAD 2009 PTD 431

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2009 →

property advocates from Dera Nawab Sahib lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes