Find a Lawyer

ZAIIID HIUSSAIN MALIK versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY LAW, ISLAMABAD

Section 199 of the Constitution changed the proposed events and events during the ratification of the Constitution to touch the subject of the cause. After leaving the field of no direct issue or dispute effect, it was generally practiced by the High Court that where there was no direct issue or dispute, the court was not required to have academic discussion and Instead, matters should be dealt with in the light of changing events. The matter was not issued by the court;

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2009

• WATEEN TELECOM (PVT.) LTD., through Attorney v. Malik ABDUL AHAD 2009 PLD 429
• SIKANDAR HAYAT v. Mst. NARGIS PARVEEN 2009 CLC 429
• Subedar IMTIAZ AHMED v. Mst. FARZANA BIBI 2009 PCrLJ 430
• GUJRANWALA STEEL FURNACE, SIALKOT through Authorized Representative v. CHAIRMAN, FEDERAL BOARD OF REVENUE, ISLAMABAD 2009 PTD 431
• MUHAMMAD HAYAT KHAN v. DIN MUHAMMAD 2009 MLD 433
• PETROSIN CORPORATION PVT. LTD. v. MOL PAKISTAN OIL AND GAS CO. B.V. 2009 MLD 437
• Mst. HAMIDA YASMIN v. AHMAD ALI 2009 CLC 438
• NAZIR AHMAD v. State 2009 YLR 439

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2009 →

attorney vs advocate vs counsel from Mari Indus lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes