Section 497 (2) of the Conduct Rule (XLV of 1860), Section 365B bail, further investigation grant accused, no doubt nominated with specific role in the FIR, but the High Court had to look That he was responsible for the crime under which he was responsible. Whether or not he was prosecuted according to the facts and circumstances of the case, the story was told in the FIR; for reasons it was found to be irrelevant, incomprehensible and unreliable, the accused, including his accomplices, Had entered the complainant's home with. The abduction was found unnatural because none of the accused was equipped with a weapon. It was not possible that someone would go empty-handed with the intention of commissioning a crime of abduction and that too in the complainant's house, wherever possible. Other family members were also present at the scene of the incident. It was absolutely unbelievable that the accused had gone to the extent of abducting the complainant's daughter for the purpose of abusing Bill Jaber, but was acquitted of the crime under section BBBB, PPC, But in the circumstances, the crime against the accused was not proved because neither the complainant's members had tried to apprehend the accused nor had they resisted the accused in the case which led to more. Investigating.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2009
